Josefin Bouveng Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-15 Country: Sweden

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2017-18	Djurgårdens IF	SDHL	33	6	6	12	0.364	0.4200	0.4200	—	—
2018-19	Djurgårdens IF	SDHL	27	14	12	26	0.963	1.1123	1.1123	—	—
2019-20	Djurgårdens IF	SDHL	25	8	4	12	0.480	0.5544	0.5544	—	—
2020-21	Brynäs IF	SDHL	36	24	23	47	1.306	1.5080	1.5080	—	—
2021-22	Brynäs IF	SDHL	28	24	22	46	1.643	1.8975	1.8975	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2025-26	Minnesota	D1	WCHA-W	SR	31	15	28	43	1.387
2024-25	Minnesota	D1	WCHA-W	JR	39	13	20	33	0.846
2023-24	Minnesota	D1	WCHA-W	SO	39	19	31	50	1.282
2022-23	Minnesota	D1	WCHA-W	FR	32	9	7	16	0.500

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

1.69

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.50

2022-23 · Minnesota

-70.5% vs. projection

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.