IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Claire Murdoch Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-10-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Burlington Barracudas AA OWHL-U22 29 7 9 16 0.552 0.1932 0.1932 — —
2022-23 Burlington Barracudas AA OWHL-U22 41 21 48 69 1.683 0.5894 0.5894 — —
2023-24 Burlington Barracudas AA OWHL-U22 42 51 73 124 2.952 1.0339 1.0339 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UConn D1 HEA-W SO 39 12 27 39 1.000
2024-25 UConn D1 HEA-W FR 36 13 16 29 0.806
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.85
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.81
2024-25 · UConn
-5.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 29 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
34%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
66%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#225
Forward overall
#8
Forward born in 2006
#4
in OWHL-U22

D1 Comparables

Erin Conway
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.48 PPG
→ Brown (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.92 Average
NCAAe PPG
Theresa Knutson
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 3.95 PPG
→ UConn (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
1.09 Average
NCAAe PPG
Maria Lindh
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.90 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Erin Conway
Brown ·
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Theresa Knutson
UConn ·
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Maria Lindh
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.306 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.