IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Madelyn Christian Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-12-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Elk River/Zimmerman (women) USHS-MN-W 25 7 2 9 0.360 0.0578 0.0578 — —
2018-19 Elk River/Zimmerman (women) USHS-MN-W 25 16 13 29 1.160 0.1863 0.1863 — —
2019-20 Elk River/Zimmerman (women) USHS-MN-W 25 24 10 34 1.360 0.2184 0.2184 — —
2020-21 Elk River/Zimmerman (women) USHS-MN-W 20 27 16 43 2.150 0.3453 0.3453 — —
2021-22 Elk River/Zimmerman (women) USHS-MN-W 28 25 16 41 1.464 0.2352 0.2352 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Penn State D1 WCHA-W SR 39 19 16 35 0.897
2024-25 Penn State D1 WCHA-W JR 38 21 12 33 0.868
2023-24 Penn State D1 WCHA-W SO 38 5 6 11 0.289
2022-23 Penn State D1 WCHA-W FR 37 1 4 5 0.135
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2022-23 · Penn State
-26.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2554
Forward overall
#95
Forward born in 2003
#266
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Sara Hjalmarsson
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Providence (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Danielle Marmer
19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.40 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sydney Brodt
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Brooklynn Schugel
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sara Hjalmarsson
Providence ·
0.657 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Danielle Marmer
Quinnipiac ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mariah Gardner
Minnesota ·
0.071 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.