IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Addie Alvarez Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-06-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Syracuse Valley Eagles 16U 16U-AAA-W 30 19 10 29 0.967 0.3895 0.3895 — —
2021-22 Syracuse Valley Eagles 16U 16U-AAA-W 59 59 33 92 1.559 0.6282 0.6282 — —
2022-23 Syracuse Valley Eagles 19U 19U-AAA-W 51 53 18 71 1.392 0.4810 0.4810 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RIT D1 CHA-W JR 34 9 23 32 0.941
2024-25 RIT D1 CHA-W SO 36 6 26 32 0.889
2023-24 RIT D1 CHA-W FR 35 8 12 20 0.571
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.50
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2023-24 · RIT
+13.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#625
Forward overall
#14
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emma Nuutinen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Reagan Haley
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.92 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kelly Pannek
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Haley Mack
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dana Rasmussen
Ohio State ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Emma Nuutinen
North Dakota ·
0.559 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Reagan Haley
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.