Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Kiekko-Espoo | SMLIIGA-W | 17 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.235 | 0.0915 | 0.0915 |
| 2021-22 | Kiekko-Espoo | SMLIIGA-W | 22 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 0.818 | 0.3182 | 0.3182 |
| 2022-23 | Kiekko-Espoo | SMLIIGA-W | 35 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 0.857 | 0.3333 | 0.3333 |
| 2023-24 | Kiekko-Espoo | SMLIIGA-W | 31 | 11 | 37 | 48 | 1.548 | 0.6022 | 0.6022 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Mercyhurst | CHA-W | SO | 33 | 9 | 22 | 31 | 0.939 |
| 2024-25 | Mercyhurst | CHA-W | FR | 37 | 14 | 18 | 32 | 0.865 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Schammel | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 4.16 PPG | 0.611 | Minnesota State |
| Saana Valkama | SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG | 0.314 | Vermont |
| Brooke Avery | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG | 0.062 | New Hampshire |
| Jessie Aney | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 4.36 PPG | 0.267 | UConn |
| Shayna Tomlinson | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG | 0.531 | Rensselaer |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sophie McGovern | 2012-13 · 1.57 PPG | 0.857 | Norwich | NEHC |
| Eleanor Donaher | 2015-16 · 2.53 PPG | 0.524 | Lebanon Valley | UCHC |
| Allison Eder-Zdechlik | 2010-11 · 1.64 PPG | 0.815 | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
| Emily Kromer | 2016-17 · 0.96 PPG | 1.385 | Nazareth | UCHC |
| Tristan Wicklund | 2023-24 · 1.52 PPG | 0.871 | St. Norbert | NCHA |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.