IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Julia Schalin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-08-31 Country: Finland
Signed Professionally
Kiekko-Espoo · SMLIIGA-W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Kiekko-Espoo SMLIIGA-W 17 1 3 4 0.235 0.0892 0.0892 — —
2021-22 Kiekko-Espoo SMLIIGA-W 22 8 10 18 0.818 0.3103 0.3103 — —
2022-23 Kiekko-Espoo SMLIIGA-W 35 17 13 30 0.857 0.3250 0.3250 — —
2023-24 Kiekko-Espoo SMLIIGA-W 31 11 37 48 1.548 0.5872 0.5872 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst D1 CHA-W — 33 9 22 31 0.939
2024-25 Mercyhurst D1 CHA-W — 37 14 18 32 0.865
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.41
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.86
2024-25 · Mercyhurst
+109.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#919
Forward overall
#24
Forward born in 2005
#38
in SMLIIGA-W

D1 Comparables

Andrea Renner
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.00 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Abbenante
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.60 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ivy Dynek
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.56 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kelly Pannek
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.45 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Schammel
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.44 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrea Renner
Northeastern ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lauren Abbenante
Holy Cross ·
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ivy Dynek
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.