← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mercury Bischoff Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-01-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Grand Rapids-Greenway USHS-MN-W 24 12 19 31 1.292 0.2074 0.2074
2020-21 Grand Rapids-Greenway USHS-MN-W 20 31 25 56 2.800 0.4497 0.4497
2021-22 Grand Rapids-Greenway USHS-MN-W 27 49 25 74 2.741 0.4402 0.4402
2022-23 Grand Rapids-Greenway USHS-MN-W 28 44 29 73 2.607 0.4187 0.4183
2023-24 Grand Rapids-Greenway USHS-MN-W 28 39 22 61 2.179 0.3499 0.3349
2024-25 Grand Rapids-Greenway USHS-MN-W 28 58 28 86 3.071 0.4933 0.4532
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W 38 19 10 29 0.763
2025-26 Minnesota State D1 CHA-W FR 38 19 10 29 0.763
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2025-26 · Minnesota
+119.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#977
Forward overall
#13
Forward born in 2007
#27
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota Duluth ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Holy Cross ·
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bemidji State ·
0.371 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.