← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alice Sauriol Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-12-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Stanstead College Varsity (W) CAHS-W 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Stanstead College Varsity (W) CAHS-W 37 16 44 60 1.622 0.5818 0.5818
2022-23 Stanstead College Varsity (W) CAHS-W 53 25 37 62 1.170 0.4197 0.4197
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W 37 8 21 29 0.784
2024-25 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W 36 7 15 22 0.611
2023-24 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W 36 6 9 15 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.41
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2023-24 · St. Cloud State
0.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#700
Forward overall
#25
Forward born in 2003
#11
in CAHS-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.62 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.43 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.52 PPG
→ RPI (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.52 PPG
→ Lindenwood
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ohio State ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UConn ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
RPI ·
0.219 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.