Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Sherbrooke Harfangs M18 AAA | QMAAA-W | 30 | 6 | 14 | 20 | 0.667 | 0.0974 | 0.1025 |
| 2019-20 | Sherbrooke Harfangs M18 AAA | QMAAA-W | 24 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 0.708 | 0.1035 | 0.1035 |
| 2020-21 | Stanstead College Varsity (W) | CAHS-W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| 2021-22 | Stanstead College Varsity (W) | CAHS-W | 37 | 16 | 44 | 60 | 1.622 | 0.5818 | 0.5818 |
| 2022-23 | Stanstead College Varsity (W) | CAHS-W | 53 | 25 | 37 | 62 | 1.170 | 0.4197 | 0.4197 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | St. Cloud State | WCHA-W | JR | 37 | 8 | 21 | 29 | 0.784 |
| 2024-25 | St. Cloud State | WCHA-W | SO | 36 | 7 | 15 | 22 | 0.611 |
| 2023-24 | St. Cloud State | WCHA-W | FR | 36 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 0.417 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lauren Abbenante | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG | 0.607 | Holy Cross |
| Reagan Haley | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG | 0.108 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Haley Mack | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG | 0.371 | Bemidji State |
| Dana Rasmussen | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.62 PPG | 0.167 | Ohio State |
| Phoebe Staenz | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG | 0.680 | Yale |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tristan Wicklund | 2021-22 · 1.23 PPG | 0.871 | St. Norbert | NCHA |
| Kelsey Rafferty | 2012-13 · 1.57 PPG | 0.680 | Hamline | MIAC |
| Madison Davis | 2016-17 · 1.12 PPG | 0.962 | Hamline | MIAC |
| Emma Crocker | 2016-17 · 1.38 PPG | 0.769 | Elmira | UCHC |
| Bailey Coons | 2011-12 · 2.31 PPG | 0.458 | Becker | — |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.