IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stella Retrum Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 4 8 12 0.480 0.0771 0.0771 — —
2019-20 Maple Grove High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 10 16 26 1.040 0.1670 0.1670 — —
2020-21 Maple Grove High (W) USHS-MN-W 19 8 11 19 1.000 0.1606 0.1606 — —
2021-22 Maple Grove High (W) USHS-MN-W 31 35 26 61 1.968 0.3160 0.3160 — —
2022-23 Maple Grove High (W) USHS-MN-W 27 27 31 58 2.148 0.3450 0.3136 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Vermont D1 HEA-W JR 36 12 16 28 0.778
2024-25 Penn State D1 WCHA-W — 38 9 9 18 0.474
2023-24 Penn State D1 WCHA-W — 38 11 12 23 0.605
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2023-24 · Penn State
+124.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2136
Forward overall
#64
Forward born in 2005
#182
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Rebecca Lindblad
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lindsay Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.96 PPG
→ UConn (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emily Bergland
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Catherine Skaja
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rebecca Lindblad
UConn ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lindsay Roethke
UConn ·
0.027 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Emily Bergland
Bemidji State ·
0.114 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.