IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sofianna Sundelin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-13 Country: Finland
Signed Professionally
Team Kuortane · SMLIIGA-W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Team Kuortane SMLIIGA-W 26 7 7 14 0.538 0.2042 0.2042 — —
2019-20 Team Kuortane SMLIIGA-W 25 7 14 21 0.840 0.3185 0.3185 — —
2020-21 Team Kuortane SMLIIGA-W 13 11 9 20 1.538 0.5834 0.5834 — —
2021-22 Team Kuortane SMLIIGA-W 22 16 13 29 1.318 0.4999 0.4999 — —
2022-23 Team Kuortane SMLIIGA-W 14 10 8 18 1.286 0.4875 0.4875 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W — 36 16 10 26 0.722
2024-25 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W — 36 11 9 20 0.556
2023-24 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W — 36 1 7 8 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.42
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2023-24 · St. Cloud State
-47.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#601
Forward overall
#21
Forward born in 2003
#24
in SMLIIGA-W

D1 Comparables

Kelly Pannek
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emma Nuutinen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Reagan Haley
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.92 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jessie Aney
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.17 PPG
→ UConn (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kelly Pannek
Minnesota ·
1.073 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dana Rasmussen
Ohio State ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Emma Nuutinen
North Dakota ·
0.559 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.