Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Kärpät | SMLIIGA-W | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.500 | 0.1945 | 0.1945 |
| 2020-21 | Kärpät | SMLIIGA-W | 7 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 1.429 | 0.5556 | 0.5556 |
| 2021-22 | Kärpät | SMLIIGA-W | 22 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 1.182 | 0.4596 | 0.4596 |
| 2022-23 | Kärpät | SMLIIGA-W | 28 | 14 | 8 | 22 | 0.786 | 0.3056 | 0.3056 |
| 2023-24 | KalPa | SMLIIGA-W | 28 | 14 | 16 | 30 | 1.071 | 0.4167 | 0.4167 |
| 2024-25 | KalPa | SMLIIGA-W | 24 | 9 | 18 | 27 | 1.125 | 0.4375 | 0.4375 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | RIT | CHA-W | FR | 32 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 0.781 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Haley Mack | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG | 0.371 | Bemidji State |
| Reagan Haley | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.92 PPG | 0.108 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Dana Rasmussen | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG | 0.167 | Ohio State |
| Phoebe Staenz | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG | 0.680 | Yale |
| Bridget Carey | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG | 0.357 | Brown |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drew Kopek | 2021-22 · 2.33 PPG | 0.417 | SUNY Cortland | SUNYAC |
| Chloe Summerfield | 2015-16 · 1.96 PPG | 0.500 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Nina Thorson | 2021-22 · 1.04 PPG | 0.929 | Hamline | MIAC |
| Hadley Malcolmson | 2016-17 · 2.70 PPG | 0.364 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Ari Smith | 2012-13 · 2.46 PPG | — | Elmira | UCHC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.