IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Abby Stonehouse Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-03-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 London Devilettes OWHL-U22 29 12 10 22 0.759 0.2652 0.2652 — —
2022-23 London Devilettes OWHL-U22 20 10 13 23 1.150 0.4020 0.4020 — —
2023-24 Waterloo Ravens OWHL-U22 35 27 26 53 1.514 0.5294 0.5294 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Penn State D1 WCHA-W — 39 14 10 24 0.615
2024-25 Penn State D1 WCHA-W — 38 9 5 14 0.368
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.41
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2024-25 · Penn State
-10.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#989
Forward overall
#36
Forward born in 2006
#32
in OWHL-U22

D1 Comparables

Katie Detert
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.80 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ivy Dynek
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.78 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG
Saana Valkama
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG
→ Vermont (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Annie Roche
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.88 PPG
→ Colgate
0.55 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jessie Aney
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.17 PPG
→ UConn (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Katie Detert
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ivy Dynek
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Saana Valkama
Vermont ·
0.314 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.