IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Karel Préfontaine Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-12-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Stanstead College Varsity (W) CAHS-W 54 22 15 37 0.685 0.2458 0.2458 — —
2020-21 Stanstead College Varsity (W) CAHS-W 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Stanstead College Varsity (W) CAHS-W 33 17 26 43 1.303 0.4675 0.4675 — —
2022-23 Stanstead College Varsity (W) CAHS-W 47 43 23 66 1.404 0.5039 0.5039 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Cornell D1 ECAC-W — 33 11 13 24 0.727
2024-25 Cornell D1 ECAC-W — 31 11 9 20 0.645
2023-24 Cornell D1 ECAC-W — 34 11 13 24 0.706
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.42
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2023-24 · Cornell
+68.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#965
Forward overall
#26
Forward born in 2004
#15
in CAHS-W

D1 Comparables

Jessie Aney
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.17 PPG
→ UConn (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kelly Pannek
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Ivy Dynek
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.78 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG
Katie Detert
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.80 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jessie Aney
UConn ·
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kelly Pannek
Minnesota ·
1.073 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ivy Dynek
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.