IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thea Johansson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-11-22 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
HV71 · SDHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 HV71 SDHL 8 0 2 2 0.250 0.2924 0.2924 — —
2017-18 HV71 SDHL 25 1 2 3 0.120 0.1403 0.1403 — —
2018-19 HV71 SDHL 32 0 1 1 0.031 0.0365 0.0365 — —
2019-20 HV71 SDHL 33 3 3 6 0.182 0.2126 0.2126 — —
2020-21 HV71 SDHL 36 6 10 16 0.444 0.5197 0.5197 — —
2021-22 HV71 SDHL 36 7 12 19 0.528 0.6173 0.6173 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-W SR 30 17 6 23 0.767
2024-25 Mercyhurst D1 CHA-W — 36 16 12 28 0.778
2023-24 Mercyhurst D1 CHA-W — 36 19 11 30 0.833
2022-23 Mercyhurst D1 CHA-W — 37 16 20 36 0.973
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.97
2022-23 · Mercyhurst
+195.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#695
Forward overall
#27
Forward born in 2002
#186
in SDHL

D1 Comparables

Nicole Schammel
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 4.16 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.63 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Andrea Renner
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.00 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.60 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ivy Dynek
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.58 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jessie Aney
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 4.36 PPG
→ UConn (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.66 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Annie Roche
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.88 PPG
→ Colgate
0.56 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicole Schammel
Minnesota State ·
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrea Renner
Northeastern ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ivy Dynek
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.