| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Edina High | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 28 | 19 | 47 | 1.880 | 0.3019 | 0.3019 | — | — |
| 2020-21 | Edina High | USHS-MN-W | 21 | 34 | 11 | 45 | 2.143 | 0.3441 | 0.3441 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Boston College | D1 | HEA-W | — | 35 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 0.629 |
| 2024-25 | Minnesota | D1 | WCHA-W | SR | 35 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 0.229 |
| 2023-24 | Minnesota | D1 | WCHA-W | JR | 15 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.133 |
| 2022-23 | Minnesota | D1 | WCHA-W | SO | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.100 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.