← New Search ↗ Social Card

Samantha Broz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 4 3 7 0.280 0.0450 0.0450
2019-20 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 4 5 9 0.360 0.0578 0.0578
2020-21 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 19 11 13 24 1.263 0.2029 0.2029
2021-22 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 24 17 24 41 1.708 0.2744 0.2744
2022-23 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 27 35 32 67 2.482 0.3985 0.3985
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Brown D1 ECAC-W 34 6 16 22 0.647
2024-25 Brown D1 ECAC-W 27 3 15 18 0.667
2023-24 Brown D1 ECAC-W 32 6 9 15 0.469
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2023-24 · Brown
+57.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1894
Forward overall
#67
Forward born in 2004
#141
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.52 PPG
→ RPI (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.52 PPG
→ Lindenwood
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.42 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.40 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.43 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

RPI ·
0.219 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lindenwood ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.