← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lauren O'Hara Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Centennial/SLP High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 3 0 3 0.120 0.0193 0.0193
2019-20 Centennial/SLP High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 8 12 20 0.800 0.1285 0.1285
2020-21 Centennial/SLP High (women) USHS-MN-W 19 17 20 37 1.947 0.3128 0.3128
2021-22 Centennial/SLP High (women) USHS-MN-W 28 21 30 51 1.821 0.2925 0.2925
2022-23 Centennial/SLP High (women) USHS-MN-W 30 37 22 59 1.967 0.3159 0.3159
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Vermont D1 HEA-W JR 38 6 16 22 0.579
2024-25 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W SO 39 1 2 3 0.077
2023-24 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W FR 36 4 0 4 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2023-24 · Minnesota
-57.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1976
Forward overall
#54
Forward born in 2005
#152
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.96 PPG
→ UConn (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.09 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UConn ·
0.027 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UConn ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bemidji State ·
0.114 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.