icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Linköping HC | SDHL | 30 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.033 | 0.0385 | 0.0385 | — | — |
| 2021-22 | Linköping HC | SDHL | 28 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.036 | 0.0412 | 0.0412 | — | — |
| 2022-23 | Linköping HC | SDHL | 31 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.032 | 0.0373 | 0.0373 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Merrimack | D1 | HEA-W | — | 35 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 0.600 |
| 2024-25 | Merrimack | D1 | HEA-W | — | 25 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.160 |
| 2023-24 | Merrimack | D1 | HEA-W | — | 35 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.086 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.