← New Search ↗ Social Card

Janelle Evans Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Okanagan HA U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 23 8 6 14 0.609 0.1395 0.1395
2020-21 Regina Rebels SFMAAAHL-W 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 23 11 15 26 1.130 0.2590 0.2590
2022-23 RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 30 7 35 42 1.400 0.3207 0.3207
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Clarkson D1 ECAC-W 27 9 12 21 0.778
2024-25 Robert Morris D1 CHA-W 34 6 9 15 0.441
2023-24 Robert Morris D1 CHA-W 35 9 19 28 0.800
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.80
2023-24 · Robert Morris
+215.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 34 comparables)

3%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
97%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2657
Forward overall
#86
Forward born in 2005
#41
in CSSHL-U18W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.96 PPG
→ UConn (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.09 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UConn ·
0.027 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bemidji State ·
0.114 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UConn ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.