← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kamryn VanBatavia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Luverne High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 23 14 37 1.542 0.2476 0.2476
2018-19 Luverne High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 27 14 41 1.708 0.2744 0.2744
2019-20 Luverne High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 42 25 67 2.680 0.4304 0.4304
2020-21 Luverne High (W) USHS-MN-W 21 47 40 87 4.143 0.6653 0.6653
2021-22 Luverne High (W) USHS-MN-W 28 83 44 127 4.536 0.7284 0.7284
2022-23 Luverne High (W) USHS-MN-W 29 61 20 81 2.793 0.4486 0.4486
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W 38 8 13 21 0.553
2024-25 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W 36 5 6 11 0.306
2023-24 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W 37 5 4 9 0.243
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.52
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2023-24 · Minnesota
-53.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#396
Forward overall
#7
Forward born in 2005
#6
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota Duluth ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Holy Cross ·
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bemidji State ·
0.371 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.