← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lauren Zawoyski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Edina High USHS-MN-W 21 5 14 19 0.905 0.1453 0.1453
2021-22 Edina High USHS-MN-W 30 12 11 23 0.767 0.1231 0.1231
2022-23 Edina High USHS-MN-W 29 8 11 19 0.655 0.1052 0.1052
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W 38 3 18 21 0.553
2025-26 Minnesota State D1 CHA-W JR 38 3 18 21 0.553
2024-25 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W 37 0 1 1 0.027
2024-25 Minnesota State D1 CHA-W SO 37 0 1 1 0.027
2023-24 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W 38 1 5 6 0.158
2023-24 Minnesota State D1 CHA-W FR 32 1 5 6 0.188
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2023-24 · Minnesota
+64.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6862
Forward overall
#287
Forward born in 2005
#1704
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Cloud State ·
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bemidji State ·
0.314 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ohio State ·
0.278 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.