← New Search ↗ Social Card

Oona Havana Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-08-20 Country: Finland
Signed Professionally
Kärpät · SMLIIGA-W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Kärpät SMLIIGA-W 6 1 1 2 0.333 0.1264 0.1264
2020-21 Kärpät SMLIIGA-W 19 10 4 14 0.737 0.2794 0.2794
2021-22 Kärpät SMLIIGA-W 25 13 14 27 1.080 0.4095 0.4095
2022-23 Kärpät SMLIIGA-W 36 23 13 36 1.000 0.3792 0.3792
2023-24 Kärpät SMLIIGA-W 0 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Vermont D1 HEA-W SO 37 14 5 19 0.513
2024-25 Vermont D1 HEA-W FR 36 3 9 12 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2024-25 · Vermont
-0.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1387
Forward overall
#46
Forward born in 2004
#63
in SMLIIGA-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.40 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.32 PPG
→ Yale (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.32 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.42 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Providence (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Cloud State ·
0.257 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Yale ·
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
North Dakota ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.