← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ayla Puppe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-03-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Northfield High (W) USHS-MN-W 7 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Northfield High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 11 14 25 1.042 0.1673 0.1673
2020-21 Northfield High (W) USHS-MN-W 17 21 10 31 1.823 0.2929 0.2929
2021-22 Northfield High (W) USHS-MN-W 29 39 31 70 2.414 0.3877 0.3877
2022-23 Northfield High (W) USHS-MN-W 28 53 35 88 3.143 0.5047 0.5047
2023-24 Northfield High (W) USHS-MN-W 30 61 50 111 3.700 0.5942 0.5452
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W SO 38 10 9 19 0.500
2025-26 Minnesota State D1 CHA-W SO 38 10 9 19 0.500
2024-25 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W FR 30 0 2 2 0.067
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.49
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2024-25 · Minnesota
-86.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#575
Forward overall
#19
Forward born in 2006
#9
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.88 PPG
→ Colgate
0.55 No data
NCAAe PPG
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG
→ Vermont (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.44 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.45 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.56 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colgate ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Vermont ·
0.314 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota State ·
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.