← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Tereza Plosová Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-07-05 Country: Czechia
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.61
Strong (0.45–0.70)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.6560
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.87
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
1.19
Elite (1.00+)
Base D3e-W PPG1.3870
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

44%
NCAA D1W
0%
NCAA D3W
56%
Club / Other

Based on 16 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 Djurgårdens IF SDHL 33 8 15 23 0.697 0.8151 0.8151
2024-25 Djurgårdens IF SDHL 35 17 9 26 0.743 0.8688 0.8688
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Minnesota WCHA-W FR 33 9 10 19 0.576

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Caitrin Lonergan NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.44 PPG 0.892 Boston College
Maria Lindh SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG 0.306 Minnesota Duluth

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Dani Sibley 2012-13 · 2.24 PPG 0.733 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Ella Tuccitto 2022-23 · 2.58 PPG 0.630 Concordia (WI) NCHA
Courtney Wittig 2013-14 · 2.41 PPG 0.692 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Kailey Bubier 2008-09 · 1.68 PPG 1.000 Southern Maine NEHC
Maddie Evangelous 2014-15 · 1.80 PPG 0.885 Elmira UCHC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.