Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Philadelphia Jr Flyers 16U | JWHL-U16 | 28 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0.214 | 0.0483 | 0.0483 |
| 2021-22 | Newark Ironbound 19U AAA | 19U-AAA-W | 20 | 7 | 21 | 28 | 1.400 | 0.4456 | 0.4456 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Stonehill | NEWHA | SR | 37 | 5 | 14 | 19 | 0.513 |
| 2024-25 | Stonehill | NEWHA | JR | 38 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 0.658 |
| 2023-24 | Stonehill | NEWHA | SO | 39 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 0.436 |
| 2022-23 | Stonehill | NEWHA | FR | 37 | 4 | 16 | 20 | 0.540 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dana Rasmussen | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG | 0.167 | Ohio State |
| Phoebe Staenz | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG | 0.680 | Yale |
| Bridget Carey | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG | 0.357 | Brown |
| Reagan Haley | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.92 PPG | 0.108 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Haley Mack | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG | 0.371 | Bemidji State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Megan Lyke | 2016-17 · 1.08 PPG | 1.000 | Lake Forest | NCHA |
| Madison Davis | 2016-17 · 1.12 PPG | 0.962 | Hamline | MIAC |
| Cheyenne Abear | 2018-19 · 1.24 PPG | 0.875 | Hamline | MIAC |
| Dani Kocina | 2013-14 · 1.88 PPG | 0.581 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Tristan Wicklund | 2021-22 · 1.23 PPG | 0.871 | St. Norbert | NCHA |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.