← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bria Holm Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Moorhead High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 5 5 10 0.400 0.0642 0.0642
2019-20 Moorhead High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 6 9 15 0.600 0.0964 0.0964
2020-21 Moorhead High (W) USHS-MN-W 20 19 8 27 1.350 0.2168 0.2168
2021-22 Moorhead High (W) USHS-MN-W 28 18 22 40 1.429 0.2294 0.2294
2022-23 Moorhead High (W) USHS-MN-W 31 25 23 48 1.548 0.2487 0.2487
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA 35 8 10 18 0.514
2024-25 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA 34 5 8 13 0.382
2023-24 Maine D1 HEA-W FR 7 1 0 1 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2023-24 · Maine
-30.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3115
Forward overall
#128
Forward born in 2004
#395
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.60 PPG
→ Penn State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota Duluth ·
0.270 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bemidji State ·
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.