IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peyton Armstrong Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-10-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Kingston Jr. Ice Wolves OWHL-U22 1 1 0 1 1.000 0.3502 0.3502 — —
2022-23 Kingston Jr. Ice Wolves OWHL-U22 43 9 13 22 0.512 0.1792 0.1792 — —
2023-24 Kingston Jr. Ice Wolves OWHL-U22 43 13 23 36 0.837 0.2932 0.2932 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Syracuse D1 CHA-W SO 37 8 10 18 0.486
2024-25 Syracuse D1 CHA-W — 38 5 11 16 0.421
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2024-25 · Syracuse
+98.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2924
Forward overall
#115
Forward born in 2006
#135
in OWHL-U22

D1 Comparables

Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Casey Leveillee
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Vermont (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Paige Voight
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Amy Petersen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ Penn State (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Madison Morton
Elmira · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Hantge
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2015-16
1.417 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hannah Zavoral
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.