IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Isabelle Goettl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Andover High USHS-MN-W 24 16 13 29 1.208 0.1941 0.1941 — —
2020-21 Andover High USHS-MN-W 23 11 20 31 1.348 0.2165 0.2165 — —
2021-22 Andover High USHS-MN-W 29 28 28 56 1.931 0.3101 0.3101 — —
2022-23 Andover High USHS-MN-W 30 25 46 71 2.367 0.3801 0.3801 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W — 36 7 11 18 0.500
2024-25 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W — 37 6 9 15 0.405
2023-24 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1818
Forward overall
#62
Forward born in 2004
#126
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Lauren Hespenheide
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.40 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brittany Wheeler
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.32 PPG
→ Yale (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.32 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Corbin Boyd
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.42 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Darby Dodds
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.43 PPG
→ Lindenwood
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lauren Hespenheide
St. Cloud State ·
0.257 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brittany Wheeler
Yale ·
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
North Dakota ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.