← New Search ↗ Social Card

Danielle Burgen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Chisago Lakes High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 7 7 14 0.560 0.0846 0.0846
2017-18 Chisago Lakes High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 9 12 21 0.840 0.1268 0.1268
2018-19 Chisago Lakes High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 19 29 48 1.920 0.2899 0.2899
2019-20 Chisago Lakes High (W) USHS-MN-W 22 23 24 47 2.136 0.3226 0.3226
2020-21 Chisago Lakes High (W) USHS-MN-W 22 27 26 53 2.409 0.3638 0.3638
2021-22 Chisago Lakes High (W) USHS-MN-W 26 42 24 66 2.538 0.3833 0.3833
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-W SR 38 5 13 18 0.474
2024-25 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-W JR 38 7 9 16 0.421
2023-24 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-W SO 39 6 5 11 0.282
2022-23 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-W FR 34 1 4 5 0.147
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2022-23 · Minnesota Duluth
-50.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1254
Forward overall
#43
Forward born in 2004
#52
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.52 PPG
→ RPI (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.52 PPG
→ Lindenwood
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.43 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.62 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.42 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

RPI ·
0.219 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lindenwood ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
UConn ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.