IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Addie Bowlby Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-05-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Burnsville High (women) USHS-MN-W 20 3 4 7 0.350 0.0562 0.0562 — —
2021-22 Burnsville High (women) USHS-MN-W 31 21 14 35 1.129 0.1813 0.1813 — —
2022-23 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 30 26 25 51 1.700 0.2730 0.2730 — —
2023-24 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 27 45 21 66 2.444 0.3926 0.3627 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA — 36 10 6 16 0.444
2024-25 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA — 31 2 3 5 0.161
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2024-25 · Sacred Heart
-42.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1985
Forward overall
#72
Forward born in 2006
#156
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Brooklynn Schugel
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.26 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Caroline Murphy
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Yale (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Natasia Burzynski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Providence (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan McLaughlin
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.22 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Catherine Skaja
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.21 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brooklynn Schugel
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.270 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Caroline Murphy
Yale ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Natasia Burzynski
Providence ·
0.030 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.