IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Raedyn Spademan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-06-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Calgary Edge School U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 27 8 13 21 0.778 0.1782 0.1782 — —
2022-23 RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 29 12 8 20 0.690 0.1580 0.1580 — —
2023-24 RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 30 20 27 47 1.567 0.3589 0.3589 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Clarkson D1 ECAC-W — 35 7 8 15 0.429
2024-25 Clarkson D1 ECAC-W — 37 6 5 11 0.297
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2024-25 · Clarkson
+24.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 35 comparables)

9%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
91%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2762
Forward overall
#100
Forward born in 2006
#45
in CSSHL-U18W

D1 Comparables

Caroline Murphy
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Yale (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan McLaughlin
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.22 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brooklynn Schugel
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.26 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Catherine Skaja
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.21 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carly Bullock
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.20 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Caroline Murphy
Yale ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan McLaughlin
Minnesota ·
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brooklynn Schugel
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.270 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.