IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jenna Smellie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-01-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Etobicoke Dolphins OWHL-U22 28 7 9 16 0.571 0.1998 0.1998 — —
2022-23 Etobicoke Dolphins OWHL-U22 43 8 13 21 0.488 0.1707 0.1707 — —
2023-24 Etobicoke Dolphins OWHL-U22 38 21 22 43 1.132 0.3956 0.3956 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Clarkson D1 ECAC-W — 35 2 12 14 0.400
2024-25 Clarkson D1 ECAC-W — 33 2 6 8 0.242
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2024-25 · Clarkson
-7.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2339
Forward overall
#85
Forward born in 2006
#94
in OWHL-U22

D1 Comparables

Darby Dodds
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.43 PPG
→ Lindenwood
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Corbin Boyd
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.42 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie Rooney
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.52 PPG
→ RPI (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Hespenheide
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.40 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.43 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Darby Dodds
Lindenwood ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Corbin Boyd
Minnesota ·
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Katie Rooney
RPI ·
0.219 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.