IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kate Ham Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep-Girls 31 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep-Girls 32 1 1 2 0.060 0.0276 0.0276 — —
2019-20 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep-Girls 33 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep-Girls 30 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Boston College D1 HEA-W SR 35 10 4 14 0.400
2024-25 Boston College D1 HEA-W JR 36 9 8 17 0.472
2023-24 Boston College D1 HEA-W SO 35 3 1 4 0.114
2022-23 Boston College D1 HEA-W FR 35 5 4 9 0.257
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.02
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2022-23 · Boston College
+989.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17100
Forward overall
#621
Forward born in 2003
#1761
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Morgan McKim
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.10 PPG
→ Cornell (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Megan Berg
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
Olivia Arkell
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
Katie Huntington
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
Sharon Frankel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Princeton (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Morgan McKim
Cornell ·
0.087 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Megan Berg
Minnesota ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Olivia Arkell
Minnesota ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.