IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nea Tervonen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-25 Country: Finland
Signed Professionally
Team Kuortane · SMLIIGA-W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Team Kuortane SMLIIGA-W 22 0 3 3 0.136 0.0530 0.0530 — —
2019-20 Team Kuortane SMLIIGA-W 30 4 20 24 0.800 0.3111 0.3111 — —
2020-21 Team Kuortane SMLIIGA-W 13 4 2 6 0.462 0.1795 0.1795 — —
2021-22 Team Kuortane SMLIIGA-W 26 8 18 26 1.000 0.3889 0.3889 — —
2022-23 Team Kuortane SMLIIGA-W 34 13 20 33 0.971 0.3775 0.3775 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Syracuse D1 CHA-W JR 36 7 7 14 0.389
2024-25 Syracuse D1 CHA-W — 38 7 11 18 0.474
2023-24 Syracuse D1 CHA-W — 34 3 4 7 0.206
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2023-24 · Syracuse
-37.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1760
Forward overall
#64
Forward born in 2003
#78
in SMLIIGA-W

D1 Comparables

Brittany Wheeler
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.32 PPG
→ Yale (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.32 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brooklynn Schugel
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.26 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Natasia Burzynski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Providence (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan McLaughlin
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.22 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.