← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josie St. Martin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-05-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Stillwater High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 15 18 33 1.320 0.1993 0.1993
2020-21 Stillwater High (women) USHS-MN-W 23 20 26 46 2.000 0.3020 0.3020
2021-22 Stillwater High (women) USHS-MN-W 27 28 19 47 1.741 0.2628 0.2628
2022-23 Stillwater High (women) USHS-MN-W 23 23 28 51 2.217 0.3348 0.3348
2023-24 Stillwater High (women) USHS-MN-W 23 26 39 65 2.826 0.4267 0.3935
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-W SO 38 4 10 14 0.368
2024-25 Ohio State D1 WCHA-W 32 5 5 10 0.312
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2024-25 · Ohio State
-1.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1283
Forward overall
#51
Forward born in 2006
#54
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.43 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.62 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.52 PPG
→ RPI (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.52 PPG
→ Lindenwood
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UConn ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ohio State ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
RPI ·
0.219 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.