← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kate Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-05-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 East Grand Forks High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 11 4 15 0.625 0.1004 0.1004
2019-20 East Grand Forks High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 23 12 35 1.522 0.2444 0.2444
2020-21 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 22 21 20 41 1.864 0.2993 0.2993
2021-22 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 30 48 38 86 2.867 0.4604 0.4604
2022-23 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 30 38 60 98 3.267 0.5246 0.5246
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W 36 2 11 13 0.361
2024-25 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W 37 3 8 11 0.297
2023-24 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W 36 2 4 6 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.43
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2023-24 · Bemidji State
-61.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#870
Forward overall
#22
Forward born in 2005
#19
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.80 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.78 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.17 PPG
→ UConn (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG
→ Vermont (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.88 PPG
→ Colgate
0.55 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
UConn ·
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.