IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stina Sandberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-12-14 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
Brynäs IF · SDHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Brynäs IF SDHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Brynäs IF SDHL 36 3 2 5 0.139 0.1604 0.1604 — —
2024-25 Brynäs IF SDHL 33 1 2 3 0.091 0.1050 0.1050 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Merrimack D1 HEA-W — 35 6 6 12 0.343
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.34
2025-26 · Merrimack
+215.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6469
Forward overall
#300
Forward born in 2004
#550
in SDHL

D1 Comparables

Mac Johnson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Abby Halluska
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Freiburger
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sophia Kunin
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jacqueline Kaasa
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mac Johnson
St. Cloud State ·
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Abby Halluska
Bemidji State ·
0.314 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rebecca Freiburger
Ohio State ·
0.278 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.