Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Durham West Jr. Lightning | OWHL-U22 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.500 | 0.1751 | 0.1751 |
| 2022-23 | Durham West Jr. Lightning | OWHL-U22 | 37 | 15 | 16 | 31 | 0.838 | 0.2934 | 0.2934 |
| 2023-24 | Durham West Jr. Lightning | OWHL-U22 | 29 | 13 | 15 | 28 | 0.966 | 0.3381 | 0.3381 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Boston University | HEA-W | SO | 34 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 0.353 |
| 2024-25 | Boston University | HEA-W | FR | 38 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 0.210 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan McLaughlin | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.22 PPG | 0.294 | Minnesota State |
| Brooklynn Schugel | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.26 PPG | 0.270 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Catherine Skaja | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.21 PPG | 0.342 | Minnesota |
| Carly Bullock | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.20 PPG | 0.812 | Princeton |
| Karlie Lund | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.20 PPG | 1.182 | Princeton |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikah Baptiste | 2015-16 · 1.83 PPG | 0.667 | Norwich | NEHC |
| Amanda Sergent | 2015-16 · 1.83 PPG | 0.667 | Wisconsin-Superior | WIAC |
| Taylor Whitney | 2017-18 · 1.42 PPG | 0.862 | SUNY Plattsburgh | SUNYAC |
| Nina Hudakova | 2022-23 · 1.28 PPG | 0.962 | Wilkes | UCHC |
| Callie Hoff | 2013-14 · 0.92 PPG | 1.321 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.