IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lily Fetch Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 East Ridge High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 10 29 39 1.560 0.2505 0.2505 — —
2020-21 East Ridge High (women) USHS-MN-W 19 15 7 22 1.158 0.1860 0.1860 — —
2021-22 East Ridge High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 23 21 44 1.760 0.2827 0.2827 — —
2022-23 East Ridge High (women) USHS-MN-W 26 16 25 41 1.577 0.2533 0.2533 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Maine D1 HEA-W JR 36 6 4 10 0.278
2024-25 Maine D1 HEA-W SO 33 8 7 15 0.455
2023-24 Maine D1 HEA-W FR 35 3 8 11 0.314
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2023-24 · Maine
+38.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2882
Forward overall
#98
Forward born in 2005
#334
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Kiki Radke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brooke Madsen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.60 PPG
→ Penn State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Lydia Passolt
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.60 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brooklynn Schugel
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sydney Brodt
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kiki Radke
Bemidji State ·
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brooke Madsen
Penn State ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lydia Passolt
Bemidji State ·
0.095 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.