IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zoe Ziotas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-04-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Durham West Jr. Lightning OWHL-U22 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Durham West Jr. Lightning OWHL-U22 43 12 15 27 0.628 0.2195 0.2195 — —
2023-24 Durham West Jr. Lightning OWHL-U22 39 13 14 27 0.692 0.2420 0.2420 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RIT D1 CHA-W SO 30 5 5 10 0.333
2024-25 RIT D1 CHA-W FR 5 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3182
Forward overall
#121
Forward born in 2006
#157
in OWHL-U22

D1 Comparables

Danielle Marmer
19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sydney Brodt
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Brooklynn Schugel
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sara Hjalmarsson
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Providence (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kiki Radke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Danielle Marmer
Quinnipiac ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sydney Brodt
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brooklynn Schugel
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.270 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.