IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Katelynn Charlton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-07-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Brampton Canadettes OWHL-U22 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Burlington Barracudas AA OWHL-U22 42 6 10 16 0.381 0.1334 0.1334 — —
2023-24 Burlington Barracudas AA OWHL-U22 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Burlington Barracudas AA OWHL-U22 40 17 23 40 1.000 0.3502 0.3502 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Delaware D1 NEWHA FR 33 5 5 10 0.303
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2025-26 · Delaware
+34.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2665
Forward overall
#102
Forward born in 2006
#119
in OWHL-U22

D1 Comparables

Brittany Wheeler
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.32 PPG
→ Yale (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.32 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Melissa Haganey
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carly Radovich
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brooklynn Schugel
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.26 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brittany Wheeler
Yale ·
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
North Dakota ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Melissa Haganey
Northeastern ·
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.