IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cara Sajevic Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-08-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Minnehaha United (W) USHS-MN-W 26 4 7 11 0.423 0.0679 0.0679 — —
2020-21 Gentry Academy (women) USHS-MN-W 22 29 16 45 2.046 0.3285 0.3285 — —
2021-22 Gentry Academy (women) USHS-MN-W 31 49 26 75 2.419 0.3886 0.3886 — —
2022-23 Gentry Academy (women) USHS-MN-W 24 35 42 77 3.208 0.5153 0.5153 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Thomas D1 CHA-W JR 36 4 6 10 0.278
2024-25 St. Thomas D1 CHA-W SO 34 6 8 14 0.412
2023-24 St. Thomas D1 CHA-W FR 36 4 5 9 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.40
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2023-24 · St. Thomas
-37.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#968
Forward overall
#27
Forward born in 2004
#24
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Ivy Dynek
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.78 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jessie Aney
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.17 PPG
→ UConn (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie Detert
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.80 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kelly Pannek
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Saana Valkama
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG
→ Vermont (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ivy Dynek
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jessie Aney
UConn ·
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Katie Detert
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.