Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Prior Lake High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.040 | 0.0060 | 0.0060 |
| 2019-20 | Prior Lake High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 0.480 | 0.0725 | 0.0725 |
| 2020-21 | Prior Lake High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 19 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 0.526 | 0.0795 | 0.0795 |
| 2021-22 | Prior Lake High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 23 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.348 | 0.0525 | 0.0525 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Long Island Univ. | CHA-W | SR | 29 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 0.345 |
| 2024-25 | Long Island Univ. | CHA-W | JR | 37 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 0.216 |
| 2023-24 | Long Island Univ. | CHA-W | SO | 37 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 0.324 |
| 2022-23 | LIU | CHA-W | FR | 24 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.208 |
| 2022-23 | Long Island Univ. | CHA-W | FR | 24 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.208 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Anderson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG | 0.290 | Yale |
| Taylor Heise | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG | 0.897 | Minnesota |
| Presley Norby | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG | 0.525 | Wisconsin |
| Carly Lang | USHS-W · 2012-13 · 0.58 PPG | 0.000 | Clarkson |
| Sierra Smith | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG | 0.000 | Minnesota |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Smythe | 2024-25 · 1.16 PPG | 0.105 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Rylie Griffiths | 2025-26 · 0.31 PPG | — | Post | NE10 |
| Kaitlin Roberts | 2023-24 · 0.31 PPG | — | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
| Kellsey Kludt | 2024-25 · 0.68 PPG | 0.200 | St. Olaf | MIAC |
| Madison McCullough | 2022-23 · 0.32 PPG | — | Wisconsin-Superior | WIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.