← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maria Lindberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-03 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
Djurgårdens IF · SDHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Djurgårdens IF SDHL 33 1 4 5 0.151 0.1750 0.1750
2020-21 Djurgårdens IF SDHL 34 5 3 8 0.235 0.2718 0.2718
2021-22 Djurgårdens IF SDHL 34 6 5 11 0.324 0.3736 0.3736
2022-23 Djurgårdens IF SDHL 28 3 1 4 0.143 0.1650 0.1650
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Merrimack D1 HEA-W 35 3 7 10 0.286
2024-25 Merrimack D1 HEA-W 36 11 8 19 0.528
2023-24 Merrimack D1 HEA-W 36 9 7 16 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2023-24 · Merrimack
+108.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2734
Forward overall
#103
Forward born in 2003
#362
in SDHL

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota ·
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Yale ·
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Quinnipiac ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.