IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kerttu Lehmus Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-09-16 Country: Finland
Signed Professionally
Team Kuortane · SMLIIGA-W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Ilves SMLIIGA-W 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 Ilves SMLIIGA-W 29 3 4 7 0.241 0.0915 0.0915 — —
2020-21 Team Kuortane SMLIIGA-W 17 1 1 2 0.118 0.0446 0.0446 — —
2021-22 Team Kuortane SMLIIGA-W 26 1 2 3 0.115 0.0438 0.0438 — —
2022-23 Team Kuortane SMLIIGA-W 36 3 4 7 0.194 0.0737 0.0737 — —
2023-24 Team Kuortane SMLIIGA-W 32 1 2 3 0.094 0.0356 0.0356 — —
2024-25 Team Kuortane SMLIIGA-W 32 13 12 25 0.781 0.2962 0.2962 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Merrimack D1 HEA-W — 35 5 4 9 0.257
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2025-26 · Merrimack
+56.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5054
Forward overall
#205
Forward born in 2005
#203
in SMLIIGA-W

D1 Comparables

Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Casey Leveillee
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Vermont (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Paige Voight
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Amy Petersen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ Penn State (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Liz Schepers
Ohio State ·
0.410 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Casey Leveillee
Vermont ·
0.265 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Paige Voight
Merrimack ·
0.559 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.