← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shae Messner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 4 2 6 0.240 0.0385 0.0385
2018-19 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 9 8 17 0.680 0.1092 0.1092
2019-20 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 12 7 19 0.760 0.1221 0.1221
2020-21 USHS-MN-W 17 11 7 18 1.059 0.1700 0.1700
2021-22 Holy Family Catholic (women) USHS-MN-W 27 18 18 36 1.333 0.2141 0.2141
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Dartmouth D1 ECAC-W SR 31 4 5 9 0.290
2024-25 Dartmouth D1 ECAC-W JR 28 2 4 6 0.214
2023-24 Dartmouth D1 ECAC-W SO 30 7 7 14 0.467
2022-23 Dartmouth D1 ECAC-W FR 14 0 1 1 0.071
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2022-23 · Dartmouth
-51.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4518
Forward overall
#204
Forward born in 2004
#812
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.32 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Brown (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Princeton (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.40 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota Duluth ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brown ·
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.