IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shelby Sandberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-06-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Blaine High USHS-MN-W 25 6 4 10 0.400 0.0642 0.0642 — —
2020-21 Blaine High USHS-MN-W 19 7 7 14 0.737 0.1183 0.1183 — —
2021-22 Blaine High USHS-MN-W 27 16 20 36 1.333 0.2141 0.2141 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W — 36 4 5 9 0.250
2024-25 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W — 37 2 3 5 0.135
2023-24 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W — 21 0 1 1 0.048
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.05
2023-24 · Bemidji State
-74.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5533
Forward overall
#228
Forward born in 2005
#1171
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Sydney Brodt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.32 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Sena Hanson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Brown (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Savannah Quandt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Molly Strabley
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Princeton (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.40 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sydney Brodt
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sena Hanson
Brown ·
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Savannah Quandt
Minnesota ·
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.