← New Search ↗ Social Card

MacKenzie Moss Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-08-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Rosemount High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 4 5 9 0.360 0.0544 0.0544
2018-19 Holy Family Catholic (women) USHS-MN-W 21 8 2 10 0.476 0.0719 0.0719
2019-20 Holy Family Catholic (women) USHS-MN-W 24 4 5 9 0.375 0.0566 0.0566
2020-21 Holy Family Catholic (women) USHS-MN-W 20 4 7 11 0.550 0.0830 0.0830
2021-22 Holy Family Catholic (women) USHS-MN-W 27 3 6 9 0.333 0.0503 0.0503
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint Anselm D1 NEWHA SR 35 5 3 8 0.229
2024-25 Saint Anselm D1 NEWHA JR 37 1 3 4 0.108
2023-24 Saint Anselm D1 NEWHA SO 7 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Saint Anselm D1 NEWHA FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10574
Forward overall
#502
Forward born in 2004
#3562
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Yale (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Elite
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ RIT (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin ·
0.525 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Yale ·
0.290 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.897 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.