Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | North York Storm | OWHL-U22 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.200 | 0.0700 | 0.0700 |
| 2022-23 | Brampton Canadettes | OWHL-U22 | 41 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 0.390 | 0.1366 | 0.1366 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Post | CHA-W | JR | 34 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 0.235 |
| 2024-25 | Post | CHA-W | SO | 37 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 0.189 |
| 2024-25 | Post | CHA-W | SO | 33 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 0.182 |
| 2023-24 | Post | CHA-W | FR | 35 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.114 |
| 2023-24 | Post | CHA-W | FR | 29 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.138 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vilma Tanskanen | SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG | 0.182 | North Dakota |
| Lydia Passolt | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG | 0.095 | Bemidji State |
| Carly Bullock | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG | 0.812 | Princeton |
| Emily Antony | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG | 0.444 | Minnesota State |
| Amanda Bäckebo | SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG | 0.056 | Syracuse |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gracyn Knowles | 2024-25 · 0.92 PPG | 0.548 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Katelyn Pantera | 2014-15 · 0.74 PPG | 0.667 | Amherst | NESCAC |
| Lizzie Aveson | 2011-12 · 0.74 PPG | 0.667 | SUNY Plattsburgh | SUNYAC |
| Amanda Flemming | 2013-14 · 0.88 PPG | 0.560 | Concordia | MIAC |
| Hannah Currin | 2013-14 · 1.08 PPG | 0.458 | Wisconsin-Superior | WIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.