IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Danielle Brunette Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Blaine High USHS-MN-W 25 9 11 20 0.800 0.1285 0.1285 — —
2019-20 Blaine High USHS-MN-W 25 12 11 23 0.920 0.1478 0.1478 — —
2020-21 Chisago Lakes High (W) USHS-MN-W 22 12 21 33 1.500 0.2409 0.2409 — —
2021-22 Chisago Lakes High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 22 24 46 1.917 0.3078 0.3078 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Maine D1 HEA-W SR 31 3 5 8 0.258
2024-25 Maine D1 HEA-W JR 33 1 5 6 0.182
2023-24 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-W SO 32 2 0 2 0.062
2022-23 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-W FR 8 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2834
Forward overall
#113
Forward born in 2004
#324
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Rebecca Lindblad
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lindsay Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.96 PPG
→ UConn (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Casey Leveillee
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Vermont (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emily Bergland
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rebecca Lindblad
UConn ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lindsay Roethke
UConn ·
0.027 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Liz Schepers
Ohio State ·
0.410 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.