icepath.io · Hockey Analytics

← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sienna D'Alessandro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-01-05 Country: Canada Height: 5'7" (170 cm)

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2023-24	John Abbott College	QCHL-W	25	25	31	56	2.240	0.6079	0.6302	—	—
2024-25	John Abbott College	QCHL-W	24	28	17	45	1.875	0.5089	0.5018	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2025-26	Minnesota	D1	WCHA-W	FR	38	1	7	8	0.211

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.51

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.21

2025-26 · Minnesota

-59.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

90%

Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#390

Forward overall

#10

Forward born in 2006

in QCHL-W

D1 Comparables

Saana Valkama

SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG

→ Vermont (0.31 D1 FR PPG)

0.54 Developing

NCAAe PPG

Annie Roche

USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.88 PPG

→ Colgate

0.55 No data

NCAAe PPG

Nicole Schammel

USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.44 PPG

→ Minnesota State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)

0.55 Strong

NCAAe PPG

Kelly Pannek

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.45 PPG

→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)

0.55 Elite

NCAAe PPG

Katie Detert

USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.80 PPG

→ St. Cloud State

0.52 No data

NCAAe PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.